[b]actresscp wrote:[/b] [quote]1) You can\'t prove a negative. It is impossible. There is no way to prove you can\'t do something, no way to prove you don\'t know something, no way to prove something isn\'t real. --> First, think about that. Is it not true? You can\'t prove a negative. If you \'can\' it\'s only through proving positive. For instance, in order to prove I\'m not a fish, I may prove I AM human. By proving I AM something, we can assume I\'m not two things in one and therefore rule out (thus \'proving\') I\'m not a fish, right? Can you think of a way to prove I\'m not a fish without proving I AM something? Also, in order to do this I have to have a fish to show what a fish is, for all you know my definition of fish could be the same as your definition of human! 2) In trying to prove God doesn\'t exist, they have to prove a negative. How can you do it? Well, in order to know God didn\'t exist they\'d have to know everything, right? Which in turn makes them God (since a definition of God is all-knowing), therefore disproving their original argument. 3) You can prove everything on earth exists. You can give us science, and prove it exists. You CANNOT however prove God doesn\'t. So what you proved everything on earth exists? How does that prove God doesn\'t? 4) EVEN IF you dissproved the Bible (which is not going to happen but even if it did), EVEN IF you proved evolution (again impossible but even if it was,), that does not prove God doesn\'t exist. All that would prove is the Bible was wrong and Evolution existed. For all you knew at that point, God was out there and he never did write the Bible and he caused evolution (again this is not going to happen but even if it did.). FINAL THOUGHTS: EVEN IF Athesists PROVED ALL their evidence was TRUE, and ALL their arguments were VALID, how does that prove God doesn\'t exist?[/quote] I like that. Good Job.B)