[b]vincent wrote:[/b] [quote][quote][b]MisterNathan wrote:[/b] The second post had all of two links, and neither were to the original article.[/quote] Of course not, because it wasn't entirely a copy and paste job. Still waiting for a refutal man you're dodging...[/quote] Firstly, regardless of whether it was entirely a copy and paste job or not, it was, by and large, plagiarism of copyrighted material for which you're supposed to post a source at the very least. Secondly, I'm not dodging. I didn't have the faintest intent of posting on this topic until MattBob_SquarePants sparked the idea that this might be copyright infringement. Thirdly, I don't think you're dumb. Granted, someone with much more learnedness on the topic will most definitely come along and wipe all this to smithereens, but I don't think you're dumb for believing it :P . Oh, by the way, welcome to MyPraize.