Yes, and agree completely with that. However, I think warrentless wiretapping should be [i]temporarily[/i] permitted in the case of a terrorist attack on the United States. I mean when it IS happening or just about to happen, like within 24 hours of the attack or something, if the government has strong evidence of an attack and is imminent danger. Then I think it would be necessary. I wouldn\'t want to be waiting for a judges approval while the White House is blowing up or something. Unconstitutional? Yea, probably. Scratch the probably- DEFINATELY. But sometimes in times like that you may need to bend the rules in extreme cases of emergency. Sometimes you gotta do what you gotta do. Of course afterward, there should be a formal investigation of the governments actions to show that they ONLY did what they are authorized to do, so that it doesn\'t keep happening. It should only happen in extremely special cases, like in the midst of a terrorist attack.